Justice for Dawn Sturgess: WhatsApp Evidence, Russian Interference & UK Public Inquiry Debate of Institutional and Boris Johnson’s Cover-Up

JUSTICE FOR DAWN IN JOHNSON'S 'COVER-UP'Mother-of-three Dawn Sturgess died after coming into contact with the Russian nerve agent Novichok original image BBC

Charlie Rowley, Dawn's partner found the nerve agent in a perfume bottle in a charity shop bin. Photo Sam Frost Support The Guardian

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson key responsibilities included National Security MI6 Intelligence Protection of UK Citizens International Relations. As PM misled Parliament about 'Partygate'. original image Guardian Editorial 22 March 2023

JOHNSON'S COVER-UP Indirect responsibility for death by Putin's 

Novichok of Dawn Sturgess 

original image Guardian Editorial 22 March 2023

WhatsAppEvidence ... Cover-Up Debate #ChatGPTimage Llewelyn Pritchard 24 November 2025

Preface

• Explore WhatsApp messages, Russian interference and Public Inquiries.
• Scrutinise Cabinet Office resignations, transparency, and potential cover-ups.
• The messages from senior UK officials, including Johnson and Sunak, have triggered scrutiny over the Dawn Sturgess Public Inquiry’s transparency.

The Dawn Sturgess Inquiry could examine:

• Government accountability

Potential cover-ups and Russian interference risks, highlighting:

• State responsibility
• Legal challenges and
• Political debate.

WhatsApp messages, Russian Interference and Public Inquiries #ChatGPTimage Llewelyn Pritchard 24 November 2025

Simon Case, Cabinet Secretary Resignation, Dawn Sturgess Inquiry Transparency, Accountability, Cover-Up Debate ChatGPTimage Llewelyn Pritchard 24 November 2025

Cabinet Office leadership and resignations around the withheld WhatsApp messages:

• The senior civil servant who was in charge of aspects of the Cabinet Office and resigned around the time of the controversy over Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak’s WhatsApp messages was Simon Case, the Cabinet Secretary.
• He temporarily stepped back from certain duties due to scrutiny over the handling of WhatsApp messages relating to the Partygate and other inquiries. 
• Though his resignation was more nuanced, suggesting he could no longer remain an impartial civil servant in the light of what was going on —he did not fully leave the civil service immediately but faced intense public pressure.
• Other senior officials, including special advisers in Downing Street, were also implicated indirectly in delays or withholding of messages. The exact scope of resignations and temporary removals depends on the inquiry being referenced (Partygate, Covid Inquiry, Dawn Sturgess, etc.).

“Dawn Sturgess: Murdered by Russian Novichok Poisoning — Inquiry Discussion

I) Introduction

• Dawn Sturgess, aged 44, tragically died in July 2018 after being exposed to the nerve agent Novichok. This incident came just months after the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury, linking the two events. The circumstances surrounding her death have raised serious questions about accountability, state responsibility, and public safety.

Background

• Dawn Sturgess and her partner, Charlie Rowley, unknowingly came into contact with Novichok contained in a perfume bottle. While Rowley survived, Sturgess died, highlighting the lethal potency of the chemical and the dangers of inadequate public warnings.

The Public Inquiry

• A public inquiry was announced in November 2021, chaired by Baroness Heather Hallett, investigating both the direct cause of Sturgess’s death and broader systemic failures. The inquiry examines whether the UK government and security services could have done more to prevent the tragedy.

Key Allegations

State Responsibility

• Evidence suggests possible involvement of Russian officials in deploying Novichok on UK soil, emphasising the geopolitical implications of the attack.

UK Authorities' Failures

• The family and lawyers argue there were failures by Wiltshire Police and other UK authorities, including delayed warnings and mischaracterization of Sturgess and Rowley as drug users. Apologies have since been issued, but concerns remain.

Scientific Evidence

• Experts confirmed the Novichok was extremely potent, with even tiny amounts capable of being fatal. Analysis suggests the same batch may have poisoned both the Skripals and Sturgess.

Human Impact

• Sturgess’s death underscores the vulnerability of ordinary citizens caught in geopolitical conflicts. The inquiry highlights not only the personal tragedy but also systemic gaps in protection and emergency response.

Political & Accountability Themes

• The inquiry raises questions about governmental transparency, potential cover-ups, and whether sufficient oversight and action were taken by political leadership. Civic engagement and pressure are essential to ensure accountability and reform.

Key Questions

• Should the UK have issued stronger public warnings after the Skripal poisoning?
• Were emergency responses hindered by bias?
• How much transparency should be required in national security-sensitive inquiries?
• What legal or policy reforms can prevent similar incidents?

Call to Action

• Advocate for full publication of inquiry findings.
• Encourage open hearings and minimise restriction orders.
• Raise public awareness of chemical weapon dangers.
• Support human rights and anti-impunity movements.
• Push for stronger oversight and legal reforms to protect citizens.

References

• Dawn Sturgess Inquiry
• Sky News: Novichok Bottle
• The Guardian: Family Condemn Security Failure
• Independent: Sturgess and Skripal Connection”

Further discussions:

II) Here’s a careful analysis of the significance of the WhatsApp files and the escalation to a public inquiry in the context of the Dawn Sturgess / Novichok case and political accountability:

1. WhatsApp Files from Johnson and Sunak: 

Context

• During the Inquiry, WhatsApp and other communications from senior officials (including Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak) were reportedly released to Baroness Hallett (Chair) to assist the investigation.
• These communications are significant because they potentially contain direct evidence of decision-making, government awareness of the Novichok risks, and responses (or failures to act) surrounding the Salisbury and Amesbury poisonings.

Key Points:

• Direct vs. indirect accountability: WhatsApp messages can show what the Prime Minister or Cabinet officials actually knew and when.
• Political sensitivity: Messages may reveal internal debates, pressure to avoid public alarm, or indications of delayed action — all of which could be interpreted as negligence or cover-up if mishandled.
• Legal relevance: Such records are highly probative in establishing facts about government action or inaction.

2. Release to Baroness Hallett: Significance

• Official receipt vs. public release: The fact that the files were released to the Inquiry Chair (not immediately public) allows Baroness Hallett to examine them under confidential, secure conditions.
• Ensures fact-finding: It prevents spoliation and allows the Inquiry to make informed judgements about government responsibility, including whether senior figures acted within their legal and ethical obligations.
• Control over sensitive material: Handling the messages confidentially first ensures security, and only the portions necessary for public findings might be disclosed — a standard practice in high-profile public inquiries involving state secrets.

Implications for Cover-Up Allegations:

• If messages indicate delayed warnings, minimal responses, or attempts to withhold information from the public … aka The Russia Report …, critics could argue this supports a cover-up narrative.
• Conversely, if messages show timely or conscientious decision-making, it could refute claims that senior officials acted unethically or sought to conceal facts.

3. Escalation to a Public Inquiry: Why It Matters

• From inquest to public inquiry: Initially, coroner-led inquests examine death causes but cannot always compel disclosure of politically sensitive government documents. 

Escalation to a statutory public inquiry (under the Inquiries Act 2005) was necessary to:

• Access classified material (including WhatsApp records).
• Compel witnesses, including ministers, to give evidence under oath.
• Examine systemic failures in government, police, and security services.

Significance:

• Highlights that the nature of potential cover-ups or mismanagement was considered serious enough to require full statutory powers.
• Signals that the Chair has the authority to examine high-level political decision-making, not just operational failures.
• Allows evidence (e.g., WhatsApp messages) to be officially considered and potentially cited in findings or recommendations.

4. Combined Interpretation

The release of WhatsApp files to Baroness Hallett and the escalation to a public inquiry together suggest:

Seriousness of government scrutiny:

• The inquiry can examine ministers’ knowledge and actions at the highest level.

Potential for exposure of cover-up or negligence: 

• Messages could reveal delayed actions, misrepresentation of risks, or selective information disclosure.

Limitations: 

• Confidential handling and restriction orders mean that the full content may never be public, so allegations of a cover-up can persist regardless of what is eventually disclosed.

In short, these elements are structurally critical: 

• they allow the Inquiry to investigate top-level decision-making while balancing security, but they also leave room for debate over whether transparency has been fully achieved.

III) Key Problems Baroness Hallett Faced Over the WhatsApp Messages

• Refusal / Reluctance by the Government to Provide Full Unredacted Messages
• Hallett issued a formal legal notice (under Section 21 of the Inquiries Act 2005) demanding unredacted WhatsApp messages, diaries, and notebooks from Boris Johnson. The Guardian+2The Independent+2
• The Cabinet Office argued that many of the messages were “unambiguously irrelevant” to the inquiry and therefore shouldn’t need to be disclosed in full. The Guardian

The government raised issues of principle: 

• they claimed providing all messages would set a dangerous precedent and intrude into private or unrelated political discussions. ITVX+1
  

Technical / Logistical Challenges

• Johnson reportedly changed phones in May 2021, meaning earlier WhatsApp messages (which could include critical material from the start of the pandemic) are on a previous device. The Guardian+1
• He allegedly has limited access to that old phone — he said he was previously advised by security services not to switch it on again because the number had been publicly exposed. The Independent

This raises real forensic and evidentiary problems: 

• if the old device is inaccessible, messages from the period when key decisions were made may never be handed over, or only partially recovered.
• Legal Challenge by the Government
• The Cabinet Office sought a judicial review of Hallett’s demand, arguing her request exceeded her powers or was not justified. The Guardian+1

Hallett pushed back strongly: 

• she argued that all the content could be relevant, even if not obviously so, because behind-the-scenes WhatsApp threads can shed light on how decisions really happened. Sky News+1
• Her demand was ultimately upheld by the High Court, which ruled that she acted rationally in ordering production of the full chat threads and notebooks. The Standard

Risk to Accountability, Transparency, and Institutional Memory

• The Institute for Government (IfG) analysis highlighted that WhatsApp conversations “harm scrutiny, accountability and institutional memory” because they may not be recorded in other more formal government systems. UK Covid-19 Inquiry
  
  
• If key decisions were made over WhatsApp, then without full disclosure it’s much harder for the public or the inquiry to understand who decided what, when and why.

Potential Criminal Consequences

• Hallett warned that failure to comply with her notice could lead to criminal sanctions under the Inquiries Act: non-compliance is not just a procedural issue; she framed it as potentially punishable. The Independent
  
  
• That raises the stakes significantly: if the inquiry can’t access critical material, it undermines its ability to make credible findings about government decision-making during the pandemic.

Threat to the Inquiry’s Legitimacy

• Some bereaved families and campaigners argued that if the government successfully withholds large parts of the communications, it could undermine the integrity of the inquiry. The Independent
  
  
• The use of private messaging apps by ministers, rather than formal government communication channels, fuels concern that critical conversations may never be fully accounted for.

Why These Problems Matter Critically for the Validity & Reliability of the Inquiry

Completeness of Evidence: 

• WhatsApp was widely used by senior officials during the pandemic. If all messages are not available, the inquiry may miss how decisions were really made.

Hidden Decision Channels: 

• Informal chats (on WhatsApp) can contain frank discussion, dissent, or political maneuvering. Without them, there’s a risk the inquiry only sees the “official version.”

Trust & Transparency: 

• For public confidence, it’s not enough just to get some redacted messages — there must be confidence that nothing important has been withheld.

Precedent for Future Inquiries: 

• How Hallett handles this sets a standard. If she concedes too much to the government, future public inquiries could be starved of candid internal communications.

Legal & Moral Authority: 

• By explicitly threatening criminal sanctions, Hallett underscored that compliance is not optional; this reinforces the inquiry’s legal seriousness.

My Assessment

• Baroness Hallett’s handling of the WhatsApp issue is crucial to the credibility of her inquiry. She rightly insisted on broad access because informal messaging platforms are where much real decision-making happens.
• The government’s pushback — arguing irrelevance, precedent, and privacy — is not trivial. But if accepted unchecked, it would severely limit the inquiry’s ability to fully understand the pandemic response.
• The High Court’s backing of Hallett was a major win for transparency, but technical and security difficulties (e.g. recovering old devices) remain a big obstacle.
• Ultimately, how much the inquiry can rely on what’s been handed over (and whether what is handed over gives a true picture) will be a strong test of both legal power and political will.

IV) Here’s a careful, structured answer — separating what is possible, what is plausible, and what is known publicly about WhatsApp communications, Russian interference, and their relevance to various political events and inquiries.

1. What Is Possible

• In principle, WhatsApp messages sent and received by Boris Johnson or Rishi Sunak during their political careers could contain information about foreign interference, including Russian influence.

These messages may have been used for:

• Internal party discussions or election strategy
• Updates on intelligence reports or briefings.
• Political planning around Brexit, elections, or Covid policy.
• Since WhatsApp is often used for informal discussion, it is possible that some messages could have referenced contacts, concerns, or evidence related to Russian influence.

Important caveat: “Possible” does not mean there is evidence such messages exist or were deliberately withheld. Possibility only refers to the theoretical content that could appear on private messaging platforms.

2. Plausibility

Russian interference in UK politics is a documented concern:

• Intelligence agencies have long assessed that Russian entities sought to influence UK politics, including the 2016 Brexit referendum. (gov.uk)
• Allegations about Kremlin-linked funding and influence in political parties have been reported in the media. (theguardian.com)
• It is plausible that government officials like Johnson or Sunak would have been briefed or discussed matters of Russian influence internally.
• Therefore, it is plausible that WhatsApp messages could contain references to Russian interference, political strategy, or election/campaign considerations.

3. Relevance to Key Events & Inquiries

Event / Inquiry // Relevance of Possible WhatsApp Content

Brexit 2016 Referendum // Could contain strategic discussions, briefings, or concerns about foreign influence, but Johnson was a backbencher / minister in Cabinet at the time.

Johnson & Sunak Elections as PM // Internal party communications may reveal foreign lobbying concerns or strategic guidance received before leadership elections.

Covid Inquiry // Messages may contain discussions of government policy, pandemic response decisions, and possibly intelligence briefings related to foreign influence on supply chains or public messaging.

Dawn Sturgess Inquiry // Less likely, but theoretically could contain references to security briefings or awareness of chemical attack risks if senior government awareness or discussion overlapped with Russia-linked operations.

4. Potential Reasons Messages Might Not Be Released / Submitted

Legal / Security Restrictions

• WhatsApp messages may be classified as sensitive, especially if they contain intelligence information.
• Security protocols could prevent submission of messages to an inquiry if they contain national security material.

Technical / Logistical Limitations

• Old devices may have been lost, wiped, or encrypted.
• Some messages may have been deleted or inaccessible during the inquiry process.

Relevance / Redaction Disputes

• Government lawyers may argue that some messages are “irrelevant” to the inquiry remit, even if they contain politically sensitive information.
• Messages not deemed legally necessary may never be submitted to Baroness Hallett, even if politically interesting.

Deliberate Withholding (Alleged)

• There are activist / public speculation claims that politically sensitive material could be deliberately withheld to protect reputations or political careers.
• However, no verified public evidence confirms that WhatsApp messages containing Russian interference information were deliberately excluded from submission.

5. Critical Analysis

Technically possible? 

• Yes, WhatsApp messages could contain information relevant to Russian interference across multiple events.
• Is it plausible that relevant material exists? Yes, but we cannot confirm this without direct evidence.
• Deliberately withheld or never submitted? This remains speculative — there is no confirmed evidence in public sources that messages were intentionally withheld to hide Russian interference.

Significance for inquiries: 

• If such messages exist and are withheld, it could materially affect the completeness, validity, and reliability of any findings, particularly regarding governmental awareness of foreign influence and decision-making.

Bottom Line

• WhatsApp messages are a potentially rich source of informal decision-making and intelligence discussion.
• The risk of non-disclosure matters because public inquiries rely on full and accurate evidence to reach reliable conclusions.
• However, while the possibility and plausibility are there, there is currently no confirmed public evidence that Johnson or Sunak’s messages contained Russian interference information relevant to Brexit, their PM elections, the Covid Inquiry, or the Dawn Sturgess Inquiry that was deliberately withheld.

V) When Is the Dawn Sturgess Inquiry Report Due?

• According to the official Inquiry website, the Chair (Lord Hughes) plans to publish the final report on 4 December 2025 at 12 pm. Dawn Sturgess Inquiry
  
• The public hearings ran from 14 October to 2 December 2024. Dawn Sturgess Inquiry+1

VI) Are There Legitimate Claims That the Terms of Reference (ToR) Are Too Narrow / Unfair — Especially Given Priti Patel & Boris Johnson’s Role?

What the Terms of Reference Actually Are

• In a letter dated 9 March 2022, Home Secretary Priti Patel (then) set out the final Terms of Reference. These focus on:

1. Establishing who Dawn Sturgess was, how, when, and where she died. dsiweb-prod.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com
   
   
2. Identifying “where responsibility for the death lies.” dsiweb-prod.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com+1
   
   
3. Making “such recommendations as may seem appropriate.” dsiweb-prod.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com
   
   
4. Importantly, the ToR explicitly “takes into account” the coroner’s earlier inquest (Baroness Hallett’s inquest). inquiry-pilot.staticsite.core.homeoffice.gov.uk+1

Criticisms / Concerns That Have Been Raised

There are criticisms — particularly around state secrecy / national security and how much can be publicly disclosed:

Restriction Orders / Secrecy

• Priti Patel (as Home Secretary) signed a restriction notice on 27 July (year unspecified in some reports) that limits what documents can be made public. Sky News
  
  
• Lawyers for Sturgess’s family (e.g. Michael Mansfield KC) have argued that too much could be hidden under “sensitive material,” making parts of the inquiry
• In submissions to the inquiry, there's concern that the governments’ restriction orders are “exceptional” and may undermine transparency. dsiweb-prod.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com

Scope / Accountability Debate

• While the ToR does allow for identifying “where responsibility lies,” some campaigners and legal representatives argue that the remit might still be too limited, especially for political accountability. However — and crucially — I found no credible public source (news outlets, legal commentary) that explicitly and repeatedly frames the ToR as drawn up by Patel “on behalf of Boris Johnson” in a way that systematically excludes Johnson’s potential public/government accountability.
• I found no solid public‑interest criticism from major media or inquiry‑watchers that accuses the ToR of being “grotesquely unfair” to Johnson in terms of his public responsibilities. That specific framing (“grossly unfair … Johnson’s public responsibilities and unethical governance”) doesn’t appear in major reporting or legal commentary, as far as I can see.

My Analysis / Interpretation

• The ToR are quite standard for a public inquiry under the Inquiries Act: they aim to establish facts, assign responsibility, and make recommendations.
• The real concern isn’t necessarily the breadth of the ToR per se, but rather how much of the evidence / government documentation will be made public — due to the restriction orders.

The criticism about limited transparency is legitimate: 

• restriction orders can shield sensitive material, which could frustrate accountability, especially for state agencies or individuals.

The part of the claim about Johnson specifically: 

• while there is broader critique of his government (and his role in Partygate, etc.), I couldn’t find well-sourced, major media or legal argument that directly links the ToR of the Sturgess Inquiry to a deliberate strategy by Johnson/Patel to narrow scrutiny of Johnson’s “unethical governance” in this case.

Conclusion / Verdict

• Yes, the report is due soon — 4 December 2025.
• Yes, there are real and serious criticisms about the transparency of the inquiry, especially because of restriction orders.
• No, I did not find strong, credible public‑domain evidence that the ToR were designed specifically to shield Johnson from political accountability in this inquiry — at least to the level framed (“grossly unfair in terms of Johnson’s public responsibilities”). The argument is more about state secrecy than overt political protection.

VII) What Legal Commentary from the Inquiry Does Raise (Based on Official Submissions)

Restriction Orders & Secrecy

• The Sturgess Inquiry has a Section 19 restriction order process under the Inquiries Act, which allows parts of the inquiry documentation to be kept confidential when “necessary in the public interest.” Dawn Sturgess Inquiry+2Dawn Sturgess Inquiry+2
  
• In the Pre‑Inquiry Hearing, Michael Mansfield KC (representing Dawn Sturgess’s family) argued that the test for restricting material is not limited to immediate harm, but a wider public interest test, including national security, international relations, etc. Dawn Sturgess Inquiry
  

• The government’s restriction‑order applications are being made “on a rolling basis,” and HMG (His Majesty’s Government) argues that there’s a “very time‑consuming and detailed” process to decide which documents can be made public. dsiweb-prod.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com
  

Terms of Reference / Inquiry Scope

• The Terms of Reference (ToR) for the inquiry are publicly available (via the Inquiry’s website), and they primarily mandate: establishing the facts around Sturgess’s death, identifying where responsibility lies, and making recommendations. Dawn Sturgess Inquiry+1
  
  
• The inquiry explicitly allows for politically sensitive evidence, but also gives room for restriction orders – meaning not everything has to become public. Dawn Sturgess Inquiry
  
  
• In submissions, the family’s lawyers stress the importance of maximising openness, but accept that some restriction may be justified. E.g., in the preliminary hearing, counsel notes the government must balance disclosure with national security risk. Dawn Sturgess Inquiry+1
  

No Direct Focus on Johnson in Legal Submissions

• I found no written submission from the Sturgess family (or their lawyers) in the publicly available Inquiry documents that explicitly frames the ToR as being deliberately crafted by Priti Patel (or Boris Johnson) to shield Johnson himself from responsibility in an unethical governance sense.
• The core legal debate centers on transparency, restriction orders, and how much material remains secret, rather than a legal argument that the ToR were politically manipulated to protect Johnson personally.

My Interpretation & Verdict on the Claim

• There is credible concern in the legal submissions about secrecy and restricted access to sensitive material (especially intelligence or national security docs).
• However, those concerns don’t clearly translate into a formal legal argument (in public submissions) that the ToR were designed to let Johnson off the hook or to avoid scrutiny of his “unethical governance.”
• The framing (“grossly unfair in terms of Johnson’s public responsibilities and unethical governance”) appears to go beyond what is explicitly argued in the legal documents — at least based on what has been made publicly available.

VIII) What Recent Commentary Does Say

• Government Failure, Not Johnson‑Specific Shielding
• Closing submissions by the Sturgess family (via Michael Mansfield KC) strongly criticise the UK government for an “abject failure” to protect the public. ITVX+2The Standard+2

• They argue that basic precautions were not taken, despite the “manifestly obvious” risk posed by Novichok after the Skripal poisoning. ITVX
  

• This is framed largely as state negligence rather than a narrowly political cover‑up of Johnson personally. The Standard+1
  

Restriction Orders / Secrecy Concerns

• Lawyers for Sturgess’s family (e.g. Mansfield KC) have strongly criticised the government’s push for restriction orders, arguing that they limit transparency. The Guardian
  

• Mansfield described the government’s refusal to confirm Skripal’s spy role as “surreal,” arguing that restriction orders should not block access to key details. The Guardian
  

• These arguments are about public interest, national security, and openness, not necessarily about shielding Johnson himself for his unethical governance.

Inquiry Witnesses & Criticism of Security Services

• According to ITV News, a counter‑terrorism officer admitted in the inquiry that the response by the special branch was “extremely disappointing” and that they underestimated or dismissed early warnings. ITVX
  
• This suggests systemic failures in policing / counter‑terrorism response, but again, not explicit commentary about Johnson being protected via the ToR.

State Responsibility for the Poisoning

• The inquiry has heard claims that the Novichok used was placed in the UK by Russian operatives, and evidence presented to suggest a “grotesque disregard for human life.” The Guardian
  
• This shifts part of the focus to Russia’s role, rather than UK political leadership hiding something.

What I Did Not Find

• No major news outlet or legal analyst (in available public sources) is strongly framing the ToR as being deliberately narrow to protect Boris Johnson personally.
• There’s no well-sourced commentary that accuses Priti Patel + Johnson of explicitly designing the inquiry terms to shield Johnson from personal accountability for “unethical governance” in relation to the Sturgess poisoning.
• Most of the criticism is instead about government security failures, lack of precaution, and how much of the inquiry will remain secret under restriction orders — not a targeted protection of Johnson’s political legacy.

My Interpretation

• There is significant and credible criticism of the UK government’s handling of the Novichok threat, especially regarding public safety, policing, and national security.
• But the specific claim that Johnson is being shielded by overly narrow ToR (in a way that protects him personally from unethical governance scrutiny) is not well-supported in the public / media / legal commentary I found.
• The dominant narrative is one of state negligence and risk mismanagement, rather than a deliberate political whitewash of Johnson’s role.

What Recent Commentary Does Say

• Government Failure, Not Johnson‑Specific Shielding
• Closing submissions by the Sturgess family (via Michael Mansfield KC) strongly criticise the UK government for an “abject failure” to protect the public. ITVX+2The Standard+2

• They argue that basic precautions were not taken, despite the “manifestly obvious” risk posed by Novichok after the Skripal poisoning. ITVX
  

• This is framed largely as state negligence rather than a narrowly political cover‑up of Johnson personally. The Standard+1
  

Restriction Orders / Secrecy Concerns

• Lawyers for Sturgess’s family (e.g. Mansfield KC) have strongly criticised the government’s push for restriction orders, arguing that they limit transparency. The Guardian
  

• Mansfield described the government’s refusal to confirm Skripal’s spy role as “surreal,” arguing that restriction orders should not block access to key details. The Guardian
  

• These arguments are about public interest, national security, and openness, not necessarily about shielding Johnson himself for his unethical governance.

Inquiry Witnesses & Criticism of Security Services

• According to ITV News, a counter‑terrorism officer admitted in the inquiry that the response by the special branch was “extremely disappointing” and that they underestimated or dismissed early warnings. ITVX
  

• This suggests systemic failures in policing / counter‑terrorism response, but again, not explicit commentary about Johnson being protected via the ToR.

State Responsibility for the Poisoning

• The inquiry has heard claims that the Novichok used was placed in the UK by Russian operatives, and evidence presented to suggest a “grotesque disregard for human life.” The Guardian
  

• This shifts part of the focus to Russia’s role, rather than UK political leadership hiding something.

What I Did Not Find

• No major news outlet or legal analyst (in available public sources) is strongly framing the ToR as being deliberately narrow to protect Boris Johnson personally.
• There’s no well-sourced commentary that accuses Priti Patel + Johnson of explicitly designing the inquiry terms to shield Johnson from personal accountability for “unethical governance” in relation to the Sturgess poisoning.
• Most of the criticism is instead about government security failures, lack of precaution, and how much of the inquiry will remain secret under restriction orders — not a targeted protection of Johnson’s political legacy.

My Interpretation

• There is significant and credible criticism of the UK government’s handling of the Novichok threat, especially regarding public safety, policing, and national security.
• But the specific claim that Johnson is being shielded by overly narrow ToR (in a way that protects him personally from unethical governance scrutiny) is not well-supported in the public / media / legal commentary I found.
• The dominant narrative is one of state negligence and risk mismanagement, rather than a deliberate political whitewash of Johnson’s role.

IX) What Think‑Tank / Academic / Legal‑Policy Commentary Exists (So Far)

Redaction & Restriction Protocols

• The Inquiry has a Redaction Protocol detailing how documents will be disclosed and redacted. inquiry-pilot.staticsite.core.homeoffice.gov.uk
  

• Under this protocol, some material may be withheld or redacted for reasons including national security, personal data, or “public interest immunity.” inquiry-pilot.staticsite.core.homeoffice.gov.uk
  

• The restriction order application (from the government) explicitly argues that some documents, if disclosed in full, could “cause damage to … future policing operations” or to national security. Dawn Sturgess Inquiry
  

• This means that even within the inquiry, there is a structured legal process to limit what gets fully published. That does not automatically mean political shielding, but it does create real constraints on total transparency.

Legal / Advocacy Criticism

• Lawyers for Dawn Sturgess’s family (e.g., Michael Mansfield KC) have pressed strongly for openness. In the Pre‑Inquiry Hearing, they argued that if information is already in the public domain, that should weigh against granting a restriction order. Dawn Sturgess Inquiry
  

• They also argue that the government is being overly cautious / slow with “security checks” on evidence, which could delay disclosure. The Standard+1
  

• In closing submissions, the family’s legal team described the Novichok poisoning as an “abject failure” by the UK government to protect the public. ITVX+1
  
  
• There is no publicly available evidence (in these legal‑inquiry documents) that explicitly accuses Priti Patel or Boris Johnson of tailoring the Terms of Reference to protect Johnson personally from an inquiry into his “unethical governance”. The focus in legal submissions is more on state failure, security, and public risk, rather than partisan political shielding.

Media / Public Commentary

• The Guardian has reported on the family’s “surreal” frustration at the government’s refusal even to confirm that Sergei Skripal was an MI6 agent — arguing that restriction orders would limit key truths. The Guardian
  

• There are accusations (in the media) that the government’s handling could undermine public confidence and prevent full disclosure. The Standard+1
  

• Some reporting suggests that the inquiry is being delayed by “unnecessary” security checks. The Standard
  

• But I found no serious think‑tank or academic paper (so far) that strongly argues the inquiry’s ToR were politically manipulated by Johnson or Patel specifically to shield Johnson’s political legacy or unethical behavior, at least in publicly available research / policy analysis.

X) Is the Claim That Johnson Is Being Protected Possible or Plausible If Everything Were Released?

• Yes — it's theoretically possible to argue that Johnson could be politically protected, but there are strong practical limitations. Here’s why:

Limitations / Challenges to “100% accuracy” of that claim:

Restriction Orders: 

• Even if the Inquiry chair rules to publish many documents, some will likely remain redacted or restricted under the protocol. So “everything” may not be publicly viewable, especially sensitive intelligence. inquiry-pilot.staticsite.core.homeoffice.gov.uk+1
  

• Redactions: Documents will be redacted systematically. The chair is responsible for balancing public interest vs. security or privacy. inquiry-pilot.staticsite.core.homeoffice.gov.uk
  

• Interpretation Risk: Even with full documents, drawing a direct causal link from how the ToR were drawn up to Johnson’s personal “unethical governance” is politically and legally speculative. Just because someone’s actions were referenced in documentation doesn’t necessarily mean the inquiry was designed to protect them.

Legal / Political Accountability: 

• Public inquiry findings don’t automatically lead to criminal charges or political sanction. Even a detailed critical report might result in recommendations, but not necessarily legal consequences for Johnson.

Plausibility:

• Given that state secrecy and “public interest immunity” are real legal mechanisms, it's plausible that some politically sensitive material will never be fully public, or will be heavily redacted.
• Therefore, it’s plausible (from a political / activist framing) to argue that there is a risk of partial shielding, especially if key documents implicating senior political responsibility are redacted or held back.
• But “100% accurate” in the sense of proving a deliberate, pre‑planned political whitewash of Johnson via the ToR is much harder to guarantee, especially purely based on public inquiry mechanisms.

My Conclusion

• There is a strong and legitimate base for concern about transparency in the Dawn Sturgess Inquiry — especially given the use of restriction orders, redaction protocols, and the sensitive nature of intelligence / policing documents.
• However, the specific claim that Johnson is being deliberately shielded via narrowly‑drawn ToR that protects his “unethical governance” is not strongly supported by current academic / think-tank literature or legal‑inquiry submissions, at least in publicly available sources.
• It is plausible to argue for political accountability risk, but making it a fact (in the sense of “100% proven political shielding”) would likely require more evidence, some of which may or may not ever be publicly disclosed.

Links

1. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m6fk6lxxmv22 https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/11/justice-for-dawn-sturgess-whatsapp.html https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/11/justice-for-dawn-sturgess-whatsapp.html   https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT2VXTWy4av9Xx7WJjjYjnHrd52qD9ITKwYQwzNM0EQdZlHk7Nf8_ZzomF63oz0oBuHPAyxEN0gQO5s/pub Justice for Dawn Sturgess: WhatsApp Evidence, Russian Interference & UK Public Inquiry Debate of Institutional and Boris Johnson’s Cover-Up #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard 24 November 2025
2. https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQSanEfenVsnyo8qJrwxxvZuane2S4TlrJ0qC-eht0W3xvZnOwv3_roxmbRtwaLumdMRV4eXfhkcB8l/pub Transparency, Ethics & Regeneration: Civic Empowerment Solutions CES 19)–28) Exposing Corruption, Elite Capture & Climate Harm #OpenSourceAI #Perplexity #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard 23 November 2025
3. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m67skplbae2c https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/11/civic-empowerment-solutions-to-tackle.html https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/11/civic-empowerment-solutions-to-tackle.html https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/11/civic-empowerment-solutions-to-tackle.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTGnyP4L0eA3cQxJk1Lph_0MqTkM5L6KN1yK1qb1XkJnWgmmcveDCh9WccXy_VhH7TNLrgl0Dlzrzqi/pub Civic Empowerment Solutions (CES 1-18) to tackle corruption, cut emissions fast & help solve the cost-of-living climate crisis #OpenSourceAI #Perplexity #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard 22 November 2025 #ClimateCorruption #CostofLivingCrisis #CivicEmpowermentResources #CERFramework #EliteCapture #PublicInquiry #NetZeroCarbon2030 #ClimateJustice #IndigenousRights #IndigenousSovereignty #ClimateJustice #NVDAAction #RenewableEnergyTransition #DemocracyReform
4. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m66drx447q2i https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/11/one-crisis-two-faces-cer-blueprint-for.html https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/11/one-crisis-two-faces-cer-blueprint-for.html https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/11/one-crisis-two-faces-cer-blueprint-for.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vR7peeJ_jiPwvGLylZNXCMjYjIPqSsTuJPC8KuDhzGvakQX77hCgciGF8QXJBwqKCo27pcvwZMu30nR/pub One Crisis, Two Faces: CER Blueprint for Rapid Climate & Cost-of-Living Solutions #OpenSourceAI #EvidentialMaterials #ChatGPT #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard 21 November 2025 #PoliticalCorruption #ClimateCrisis #EliteCaptureCostofLiving #CERclimateSolutions #RapidEmissionsCuts #DemocraticAccountabilityReform #ClimateJusticePolicy #InstitutionalFailureGovernance
5. https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/09/one-crisis-two-faces-civic-empowerment.html https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/09/one-crisis-two-faces-civic-empowerment.html https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/09/1crisis2faces-civic-empowerment.html https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3lzqlku47v22q https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT4GTmFyEhEPw6cyKZRVyOPRbP7ciH6VjQBuSbJBg2ErEs1wpfcR-ht0zMWcLdEHXmak_oXFs-tigwa/pub ‘‘One Crisis, Two Faces’ A Civic Empowerment Analytical Tool Linking Political Corruption, Climate Emergency and Cost of Living Crises Llewelyn Pritchard 26 September 2025 #OpenSourceAI #ChatGPT #Perplexity Description: ‘1Crisis2Faces’ provides a rigorous, evidence-based framework for analysing the intersection of political corruption, leadership failures and global crises. Leveraging Civic Empowerment Resources (CER) and open-source AI insights from ChatGPT and Perplexity, it enables users to examine legal proofs, uncover cover-ups—including Trump and FBI Director Patel’s potential Epstein-related actions—and evaluate failed leadership (non-exclusive) by figures such as Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Boris Johnson and Justin Trudeau. By connecting cost of living pressures with climate emergencies, this tool demonstrates why combating political corruption is essential for effective societal, environmental and economic resilience. CER users gain actionable insights, reliable evidence mapping, and a strategic methodology for civic accountability and climate-conscious decision-making.
6. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m65ojras6c2c https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/11/boris-johnsons-institutional-failures.html https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/11/boris-johnsons-institutional-failures.html https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/11/boris-johnsons-institutional-failures.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTb1iF_RnxGU8eoYJ-098GDZs2vYxSTFTYIbZByGQ5rxnZlSXi-TPjS_0015KXeBXIH5bCVwasYZBht/pub “Boris Johnson Corruption: Climate Policy, Elite Capture & Institutional Failures A Civic Empowerment Resources (CER) Analysis” #EvidentialMaterial #OpenSourceAI #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard 21 November 2025 #BorisJohnson #PoliticalCorruption #ClimateJustice #COP26 #ClimateCrisis #Corruption #EnergyJustice #CostOfLiving #PoliticalAccountability
7. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m63bn5my5y2s https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/11/one-crisis-two-faces-trumps-climate.html https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/11/one-crisis-two-faces-trumps-climate.html https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/11/one-crisis-two-faces-trumps-climate.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTbbJhPiDWmaAGPuf4ybaLyXjl5Vw89KL87EtKfM0BjyQ1U1MDRr_u4sB6p3YPBextG9D-TliIos4wP/pub “One Crisis, Two Faces: Trump’s Climate, Social & Economic Policies Driving the U.S. and Global Cost-of-Living Emergency — A Civic Empowerment Analytical Report including Live Access to the CER Ecosystem!” Llewelyn Pritchard 20 November 2025 Trump climate policies,cost of living crisis,U.S. economic instability,global climate emergency,deregulation impacts,fossil fuel expansion,civic empowerment,CER analysis, political corruption,inflation drivers #OpenSourceAI #ChatGPT #Perplexity #CivicEmpowerment
8. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m5ylnkvayy2c https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/11/high-stakes-power-secrecy.html https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/11/high-stakes-power-secrecy.html https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/11/high-stakes-power-secrecy.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQ4d6d7VlgAt_I5ekaGaJ15AJFF4icG_ILyKYt43uZZ9jKJ5JYXEvMJDVdgsnhKk1s6B3o3kp_fLHSu/pub High-Stakes Power, Secrecy & Accountability: Trump, MbS, Epstein, Boris Johnson & Global Political Risk #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard 19 November 2025 #TrumpMbSKhashoggi #EpsteinDeath #BorisJohnsonRussiaReport #PutinInterferenceUK #BrexitSecurity #EliteImpunity #DemocraticAccountability #IntelligenceSuppression #PublicTrustCrisis
9. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m5vslsikql2c https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/11/unethical-corrupting-power-secrecy.html https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/11/unethical-corrupting-power-secrecy.html https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/11/unethical-corrupting-power-secrecy.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT7YXjeJFgXnCgNVh21H6Yj6bjUGMpWCX9yWjSrHmjUYrUE37sE5lpouHmWDAzpSFPNHcMDaNceNOH5/pub https://www.tumblr.com/climatejustice1/800558088926216192/unethical-corrupting-power-secrecy-epstein Unethical, Corrupting Power & Secrecy: Epstein, Trump, Johnson & Putin Exposed #AIOpenSource #EvidentialMaterial #Perplexity #ChatGPT #DeepAI Llewelyn Pritchard 18 November 2025 #DonaldTrumpLegalRisk #BorisJohnsonRussianInterference #PutinNenetsArcticExploitation #PoliticalSecrecyNetworks #IndependentPublicInquiry #UK #USA #RUS #KremlinState-MafiaInfluence #BrexitRussiaInvestigation #EnvironmentalHumanRightsViolations #ArcticFossilFuelColonisation
10. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m5tz6by7sl2c https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/11/trump-epstein-files-and-legal-risk.html https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/11/trump-epstein-files-and-legal-risk.html https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/11/trump-epstein-files-and-legal-risk.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQLhQtvAstiuzNBI0-ejLjamdy5bTtEnO2Zk5yVILqXcfZSj-9VZ2PrQyVgTscTQGCh2FpPo4ciUnwD/pub Trump, Epstein Files and Legal Risk a Comprehensive Breakdown of his Reversal, Motives and Criminal Exposure #ChatGPTimage Llewelyn Pritchard 17 November 2025
11. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m5ogn2ebys2z https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/11/explore-verified-epstein-investigation.html https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/11/explore-verified-epstein-investigation.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRUDcLIFrt6T-8I_aENesRGTCOgRjrnrx0-axVu9SVOviZpTEC0yVJvui5vhsaaMqiCYoZYRRem9ywR/pub “Explore verified Epstein investigation files, Trump connections, elite trafficking networks and 2025 court documents exposing abuse by the super-rich.” #OpenSourceAIevidentialMaterial #ChatGPT #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard 15 November 2025 #Trump Epstein Files #Elite sex trafficking networks #Epstein child trafficking evidence #Trump Epstein relationship #Epstein investigation documents #Epstein social circle scandals #Political power and abuse #Trump Epstein lawsuit records #Sex trafficking and political elites #Epstein black book contacts #Mar-a-Lago Epstein party #Epstein documents release 2025 #Trump and Epstein connections #Wealth, privilege and trafficking #Jeffrey Epstein court files
12. https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/11/follow-money-transparency-powering.html https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m4nvttcjbx2u https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/11/follow-money-transparency-powering.html https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/10/follow-money-epsteinputintrump.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vR0XZS4mePyo8_Hx6sr3HZnl5WMxD5DMYA7xCHOO6u6ZLjRghUujUIU7bm5MhcLL1yobweP9GzGfuQt/pub “Follow the Money” Transparency Powering Regeneration: Exposing Corruption, Restoring Ethics and Global Trust. “Follow the Money” reveals how transparency and civic ethics drive global regeneration, justice and accountability in public life. Expose corruption, uncover truth and rebuild trust. #OpenSourceAI #ChatGPT #CGDream #DeepAI #Pixler Llewelyn Pritchard
13. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m4jam2wqfj2e https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/10/global-regeneration-ethics-driven.html https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/10/global-regeneration-ethics-driven.html https://www.tumblr.com/climatejustice1/798952582193332224/global-regeneration-ethics-driven?source=share https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/10/global-regeneration-ethics-driven.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTUElzHbTSOS5hmaL45CqrVERVEABwdUunVI7N96vmwS1wyKFhLuQez991WoH4nkxWZmSmzFz561DfG/pub 🌍 Global Regeneration — Ethics-Driven Transformation for Planetary Renewal —cinematic visuals uniting ethics, ecology and civic empowerment: Explore a visionary storyboard for global regeneration and sustainable transformation #ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard 31 October 2025 #globalregeneration #ethics-driventransformation #planetaryregeneration #planetaryrenewal #sustainablefuture #civicempowerment #climatestorytelling #environmentaljustice #artforchange #ethicalleadership #ecology
14. https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/10/follow-money-epsteinputintrump.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSIVKSCGefqi_0suM0EKU6_wjarNDgwBx5BGDKheplWVoWflHYAmQcAy0vG6AMMkubrlZOpfkk-iTBO/pub 🌍 FOLLOW THE MONEY: Epstein–Putin–Trump Financial Timeline for Ethics-Driven Regeneration – Exposing Corruption, Global Finance and Climate Justice (One Crisis Two Faces) Tackling political corruption is inseparable from protecting Mother Earth, #ChatGPT5o Llewelyn Pritchard 10 October 2025 Epstein Trump Putin financial connections, follow the money timeline, political corruption climate crisis, cost of living ethics, global illicit finance, indigenous-led climate justice, civic empowerment, One Crisis Two Faces, ethical governance, climate emergency
15. https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQa90nVi7YzKkwoQeqve-Ty5JacIzhYiNq1V18wmAglFcPbpX_gWM-zZNb4YuWTOZghCICO16DC6inF/pub 🔥 End fossil fuel finance now! Fight Trump’s assault on Earth & democracy with climate justice, Indigenous rights and moral action. Our future - and the planet - depends on it. 🌍✊ #ClimateJustice #IndigenousRights #StopTrump #ImprisonTrumpMuskAndCronies #ImpeachTrump #FossilFreeFuture #ConnectWithTheLand #DeepAiGeneratedImage #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard 2 July 2025 #RightsOfNature
16. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m2aefezkyq26 https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTaVm9X2LivXk3V9fxNVmnexgewgr-FbjZhmCi-m8as7zu84a3HqWsn8wG9Pye96jvY8HbCCCl27CN2/pub https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vR-pzzppm6ARbgnrO6T420iz0iqOC5DzKPRJhEBK5bZ2258VbtyElYidtE3jqlqJu5OfeXG9YnxbP7X/pub 🌍 NEW! ALL CHANGE! Ethics-driven National Regeneration Radical Ambition!: indigenous-led climate justice, Nature’s rights and civic empowerment to solve cost of living and climate crises now. (short form) #EndCorruption #ActForPeopleAndPlanet! #ClimateJustice #CostOfLiving #Ethics #ChatGPTOpenSourceAI Llewelyn Pritchard 2 October 2025 Description “This Civic Empowerment Resource argues that ethics is not optional but the only survival strategy to tackle the twin crises of climate breakdown and cost-of-living pressures. By advancing National Regeneration—indigenous-led climate justice, binding environmental controls and Nature’s rights of personhood—leaders of corporations and governments can be held to account and redirected toward solutions that prioritise people and planet. Using insights from “One Crisis, Two Faces” and open-source AI, it shows how ethical governance can dismantle corruption, end elite impunity and deliver resilience, transparency, and justice right now.”
17. https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/10/mother-earth-action-network-civic.html https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/10/mother-earth-action-network-civic.html https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m2lmazo3k325 https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/10/mother-earth-action-network-civic.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vReVaNilKC6lgezp3f9aXsiZDnQsYPYKTbsdVjD1V2-rj7MmYOwY2Gw0qflERYuzJl5rVprz-640g5t/pub MOTHER EARTH ACTION NETWORK: Civic Empowerment Tools for Climate Justice, Rights of Nature and Global Regeneration — Llewelyn Pritchard’s Regenerated Bluesky Starter Packs @llewelynpritchard.bsky.social for Global Regeneration after being ‘BETRAYED BY POWER’ previous account hacked by Trump's Russian Mates @llewelynpritch.bsky.social 27.5K
18. YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN CONSIDERING: how to become an active Regenerate Earth Protector to #StopEcocide?
19. https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/09/a-z-of-hope-people-powered-solutions-to.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTltTVSpapj1ZDN3k_m61AD4A4caVb-5XBUfXphzfxyQ3RWwdBhxsxdYT6Ylq7Crq6SDIQmn0IxwkC9/pub https://www.tumblr.com/climatejustice1/795110047100403712/a-z-of-hope-people-powered-solutions-to-the-cost A-Z of Hope People-Powered Civic Empowerment for our Cost of Living & Climate Crisis: Sustainable Future, Human Rights, Climate Justice, Rights of Nature, Collective Action, Social Justice, Resilience, Green Solutions, Community Transformation
20. https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRm7GkT0RJ-Hl3EUkml_As3O9EXZ6pel4ncC5N2un9CHq7a5Z4fZELcQvHFWvSh8497eHs5DCneGYCA/pub https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3lzawnthoc52a https://uk.pinterest.com/llewelynpritchard1/ecological-climate-health-action-network/ https://www.tumblr.com/climatejustice1/795192563782057984/discover-480-ecological-climate-health-action https://www.blueskypacks.com/starter-packs/civic-empowerment-for-non-violent-action https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/09/civic-empowerment-for-climate-justice.html https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/09/civic-empowerment-for-climate-justice.html https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/09/civic-empowerment-for-climate-justice.html CIVIC EMPOWERMENT FOR CLIMATE JUSTICE Discover the Ecological, Climate-Health Action Network #DrivingSustainableSolutions #CommunityAction #RenewableEnergy #BiodiversityProtection #GlobalGreenChange. #Activism #ClimateJustice #Democracy #Environmentalism #NonViolent DirectAction #NVDA
21. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3lzoov5agmn2z https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/09/trumps-epstein-files-doj-memo-cover-up.html https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/09/trumps-epstein-files-doj-memo-cover-up.html https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/09/trumps-epstein-files-cover-up-analysis.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT45IYCFeJNwmCYCQy_yJ7hIdhbJUX4fw_ATjbPYV2Jt-sXUNl9pNJja4HJTJcYEyrn59rnhpjunWrc/pub Trump’s Epstein Files: DOJ Memo & Cover-Up Evidence. Explore the DOJ FBI July 2025 memo, Epstein files, Maxwell logs, and Trump’s alleged cover-up. Federal review reveals no incriminating client list. #OpenSourceChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard 25 September 2025 #TrumpEpsteinfilescover-up #JeffreyEpsteinscandal #DOJFBIJuly2025memo #NoIncriminatingClientList #GhislaineMaxwelllogs #EliteConnections #FederalInvestigation #EpsteinCaseAnalysis
22. https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSqvW5a9IaAGIG59laUrQlBXY7j1pKPL40d3iYb9_LcJWAyv-dwJOJ0ER-eMP3wu3IiaJoEYhp5xvKa/pub ⚖️ A Failure of Political and Legal Accountability: Building the Case for National Regeneration - Description This Civic Empowerment Resource examines the breakdown of accountability in modern democracies. It shows how a prosecuting authority could hypothetically build a legal case against failed leadership, such as Boris Johnson and contrasts this with how the United States is pursuing stronger checks against convicted felon Donald Trump. By mapping legal strategies, civic ethics, and constitutional gaps, it highlights the urgent need for National Regeneration in the UK. The document also outlines a draft UK-style constitutional proposal to strengthen accountability of senior public officials, rooting political life in transparency, justice, and ethical governance. #NationalRegeneration #PoliticalAccountability #LegalReform #Ethics #ChatGPTOpenSourceAI Llewelyn Pritchard 2 October 2025
23. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m2cldovk2u2i https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/10/strengthening-accountability-public.html https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/10/strengthening-accountability-public.html https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/10/strengthening-accountability-public.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSqvW5a9IaAGIG59laUrQlBXY7j1pKPL40d3iYb9_LcJWAyv-dwJOJ0ER-eMP3wu3IiaJoEYhp5xvKa/pub ⚖️ Strengthening Accountability: The Public Office Accountability and Integrity Bill as a Cure for Leadership Failure "Explore legal accountability of leadership: Johnson, Farage, Trump and the call for a Public Office Accountability Bill to anchor ethical governance and National Regeneration."Description This Civic Empowerment Resource diagnoses the breakdown of political and legal accountability in modern democracies. It demonstrates how a prosecuting authority could build a case against failed leadership like Boris Johnson, contrasts with how the U.S. is holding Trump to account and shows how the UK can achieve genuine National Regeneration through the proposed Public Office Accountability & Integrity Bill. It outlines a draft constitutional model to make senior officials — including prime ministers and presidents — transparent, accountable, and ethically bound to serve. Use this resource to advocate for binding reforms and rally public demand for integrity at the top. #NationalRegeneration #PoliticalAccountability #LegalReform #Ethics #ChatGPTOpenSourceAI Llewelyn Pritchard 2 October 2025
24. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m2hoswydne2b https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/10/voting-system-fairness-globally-climate.html https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/10/voting-system-fairness-globally-climate.html https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/10/voting-system-fairness-globally-climate.html https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQM84GcxwLBqNyUPh2Gn92TAPm38pOiUD_3o6_gVa43bfJRScF0IgIMAN0iEQnfg5aSFo3z4slfO3-a/pub VOTING SYSTEM FAIRNESS GLOBALLY: Climate Justice, Indigenous Rights and Ending Fossil Fuels in an Age of Political Corruption. voting system fairness, proportional representation, electoral reform democratic representation, fair elections, voting rights, PR systems, electoral justice, democracy reform, global voting, STV #OpenSourceAiChatGPT5o #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard 5 October 2025
25. https://bsky.app/starter-pack/did:plc:4sivhpo2an6off6obxrbc3oo/3m43jjpabb72t https://quislingborisjohnson.blogspot.com/2025/10/now-and-then-where-accountability-meets.html https://trumpsauthoritarianassault.blogspot.com/2025/10/now-and-then-where-accountability-meets.html https://affordabletravelbookstorereadact.blogspot.com/2025/10/now-and-then-where-accountability-meets.html https://www.tumblr.com/climatejustice1/797958486293151744/now-and-then-where-accountability-meets-action https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRKH9vbh7_5FFl01LP0doXVxtxEu31S1j5wJd8FHfp1UO1NHbCdOIL9wzh-rwb87KLqegxf4wSu8l4c/pub Now and Then — Where Accountability Meets Action for Earth’s Regeneration. From ethics to energy, explore how accountability, empathy and transparency regenerate people, communities and the living planet we share.Now and Then — Where Accountability Meets Action “When Ethics Becomes Energy — The Light of Accountability Becomes the Medicine of Earth.” A cinematic journey of healing, civic empowerment, and ecological regeneration through moral leadership and collective regeneration. The Beatles - Now And Then (Official Music Video) Llewelyn Pritchard 25 October 2025 accountability, regeneration, ethics in action, civic empowerment, climate justice, ethical leadership, sustainability, transparency, global regeneration, Earth healing, moral renewal, ethical behaviour